Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 review

Diving into the nitty-gritty of the RTX 4060 specs reveals some notable variations versus the RTX 4060 Ti, in addition to some unlucky similarities. It’s the primary Lovelace graphics card to make use of the AD107 GPU die, the smallest and least highly effective of the bunch (an outline that befits the pixel pusher as a complete too.)

Listed here are the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 specs:

The RTX 4060 has simply shy of 30% much less CUDA and Tensor cores in comparison with the RTX 4060 Ti, however retains 95% of RT cores, with a shortfall of two. As anticipated, each base and enhance clock speeds are additionally noticeably decrease, too. I hoped that we’d see worth proposition from Nvidia right here, however I’d sooner describe it as acceptable contemplating the GPU’s value of $299 / £289.

The identical configuration of a 128-bit reminiscence bus and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM from the RTX 4060 Ti additionally make a reappearance on the RTX 4060, albeit with 8MB much less L2 cache to assist enhance bandwidth. This cocktail of constraints negatively impacts efficiency at greater resolutions and may even go away some choices off the desk at 1080p, which I’ll talk about intimately afterward within the evaluation.

The RTX 4060 is on the very least environment friendly, pulling with a TGP of 115W, that means you’ll solely want a single 8-pin PCIe energy connector on most fashions. Nvidia has opted to not give this graphics card the Founders Version therapy, so there’s no want to worry about 12VHPWR right here.

I’m utilizing the MSI Ventus 2X OC mannequin for our evaluation, which boasts a 30MHz overclock and is likely one of the few RTX 4060 fashions out there at MSRP/RRP. Whereas I haven’t had an opportunity to check the costlier fashions that pack bigger coolers and better clock speeds, I can confidently say you’re higher off choosing one thing like this MSI card if worth is your major concern.

For my Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 benchmarks, I’ve collected body price knowledge for native 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions. I additionally ran DLSS Body Technology exams individually. Every benchmark was run thrice to supply a mean end result, utilizing the sport’s highest high quality preset, together with any further ray tracing choices.

Listed here are the specs of my take a look at system:

• GPU: MSI Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ventus 2X OC#
• Driver: GeForce Recreation Prepared model 536.40
• OS: Home windows 11 Professional 22H2 (22621.1928)
• Motherboard: Asus TUF Gaming X670E-Plus (BIOS model 1413)
• CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• RAM: Corsair Vengeance 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR5 6,000MHz
• SSD: WD_Black SN850X
• PSU: Corsair RMx SHIFT Sequence 1000W

Analyzing my benchmark knowledge to explain Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 efficiency looks like déjà vu, because the outcomes mainly mirror the RTX 4060 Ti albeit with usually decrease body charges throughout the board. Suffice to say, this graphics card is finest fitted to 1080p gameplay with some caveats whereas taking part in video games at resolutions like 1440p or 4K is both doable at a push or solely unachievable.

At 1080p, the RTX 4060 feels expectedly performant, managing to hit common body charges of 60fps or greater within the majority of our testing suite. It even manages to sail north of 30fps when put up towards Cyberpunk 2077’s RT Extremely preset, with out assistance from DLSS.

For all these positives, nevertheless, it reveals the identical stuttering points I witnessed in my RTX 4060 Ti testing when taking part in the likes of A Plague Story: Requiem. The 8GB of VRAM and 128-bit reminiscence bus are simply saturated with each ray tracing bell and whistle turned on, even at 1080p, that means you’ll have to handle your texture high quality settings fastidiously in some cases to keep away from poor efficiency.

Enjoying video games at 1440p utilizing the RTX 4060 is doable, however I usually wouldn’t advocate it, save for some esports video games like League of Legends or Fortnite. Except for uncooked efficiency naturally being decrease than 1080p, you’re extra prone to encounter the bandwidth points I’ve highlighted with A Plague Story: Requiem.

Relating to 4K, the RTX 4060 merely isn’t outfitted for gaming at this decision. To be clear, this isn’t one thing I count on from a 60-class card to start with, and we’re solely speaking about native rendering right here.

Turning our consideration to the RTX 4060’s AI options, DLSS 3, the software program suite of Tremendous Decision and Body Technology, helps the pixel pusher punch above its weight. The upscaling know-how is effectively documented at this level, so I’d as a substitute wish to deal with the latter for a second. At appropriate resolutions, DLSS Body Technology might help double each minimal and common body charges, as was the case in our testing with F1 22. Nevertheless, it does have its limits, with diminishing returns at 1440p, and worse efficiency at 4K.

In a vacuum, the RTX 4060 performs effectively sufficient, however issues develop into extra difficult when the RX 7600 enters the image. The Nvidia GPU undoubtedly has the sting in ray-traced eventualities like Cyberpunk and Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy, however falls behind the AMD pixel pusher in rasterized workloads. After all, the Radeon graphics card doesn’t have a DLSS Body Technology equal to shut the hole, however that know-how isn’t out there in each sport.

At $299 / £289, the RTX 4060 value looks like a tough promote. Sure, it’s cheaper than its predecessor, the RTX 3060, which was at launch, however you’re prone to discover it less expensive now or for promotional provides to emerge very quickly. Then there’s present technology competitors to think about, just like the RX 7600 and Intel Arc A750 and A770.

In some methods, the RTX 3060 looks like a greater purchase too, with 12GB of VRAM and a wider reminiscence bus, that means it could possibly extra simply deal with 1440p eventualities. It’ll carry out a little bit worse than the 4060, and also you’ll forgo DLSS Body Technology assist, so it is dependent upon how necessary that’s for you. For me, the characteristic is good to have however isn’t a dealbreaker proper now.

In the event you’re not as a lot of a ray-tracing zealot as I’m, then AMD often is the better option. Trying again at my AMD Radeon RX 7600 exams, the cardboard’s rasterized body charges in Complete Battle: Warhammer 3 and Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands put each the RTX 4060 and 4060 Ti in its rearview mirror, shockingly so. Plus, it’s $30 cheaper out the gate with out even taking latest value drops into consideration.

I’m but to spend time with the Arc A750, however my experiences with the A770 recommend they’re match for these which can be solely taken with taking part in the newest PC video games and sometimes dabble with ray tracing. Even then, there are nonetheless compatibility points that crew blue must work out earlier than I can firmly advocate them, leaving the RTX 4060 trying just like the safer wager.

If Nvidia shaved $50 off right here and even matched the RX 7600, I’d be lots rosier about its price. At its marketed value level, nevertheless, I’d advocate ready for a value drop earlier than choosing one up. Belief me, you gained’t want to attend lengthy if earlier releases are any indication.

If I have been shopping for a current-generation graphics card at this time for underneath $300, I’d decide the RTX 4060. That is talking as somebody that prefers to prioritize ray tracing and different graphical niceties at the price of greater efficiency, and I perceive I’m one thing of a minority (for now).

Nvidia nonetheless has the sting with regards to ray tracing, and DLSS Body Technology helps preserve that lead and shut the hole towards AMD in rasterized video games (in the event that they assist it). Generally, it’s an honest all-around performer, however it’s under no circumstances a monumental leap in comparison with its predecessor.

The RTX 4060’s 8GB of VRAM is extra forgivable right here than it was on the RTX 4060 Ti, however not by a lot. I really hope that is the final technology of graphics playing cards with a stack that begins with 8GB of VRAM, GeForce, or in any other case. It’s already inadequate for a few of at this time’s PC video games and can proceed to battle within the years to come back if traits proceed as they’re.#

Professionals:

• Finest ray tracing efficiency for underneath $300
• Reasonably priced DLSS Body Technology assist
• Stable all-around 1080p body charges

Cons:

• Can’t sustain with AMD rasterization efficiency
• Reminiscence bandwidth points could cause stuttering
• 8GB of VRAM leaves some settings off the desk

If the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 doesn’t fit your wants, there are different pixel pushers on the market that may be good for you.

AMD Radeon RX 7600